For most of the last thirty years, delivering serious software
meant assembling a large team, and most of an engineering budget
went on the volume of the work. That is no longer the constraint.
AI agents now carry that volume, quickly and tirelessly, under
direction.
What agents do not reliably supply is judgement. An agent is
fluent and confident, and too often wrong when nobody who knows
what good looks like is reading the result. Knowing what to build, structuring it
so it is still cheap to change in year five, and recognising a
plausible answer that is wrong: that has always been senior work,
and it is the part we sell.
The result is a different shape of engagement. A small number of
senior architects, directing agents on a platform that already
enforces the standards, can deliver what would otherwise take a
much larger team, with fewer hand-offs and less to manage. The
saving is passed on, and in our experience the quality improves
rather than suffers.
Every product trades speed for quality somewhere, and year three
is usually decided in year one. Version one has never been
cheaper to produce, but good software has rarely been about
version one.
Real engineering, accelerated. The tooling changed. The engineering
did not.